Accessibility Audit

A structured evaluation of a product against WCAG, producing a list of failures with severity, location and a route to fixing each one.

Process & Methods

An accessibility audit tests a product against WCAG success criteria and returns findings that can be assigned and closed: what failed, which criterion, where, how severe, and what fixing it involves. It is the input to a remediation plan, not a compliance certificate — and increasingly it is a commercial document, because enterprise procurement and the European Accessibility Act both ask for evidence rather than assurances.

Automated scanners find roughly a third of issues: missing alt attributes, contrast failures, absent form labels. They cannot tell you whether alt text is meaningful, whether focus order matches the visual order, whether a custom component announces its state, or whether a keyboard user can complete the flow. That part requires manual testing with a keyboard and with screen readers, and it is where the issues that actually block people live.

Audit early, not at launch

Findings against a shipped product are expensive because the fixes are structural — focus management, semantics, component APIs. The same audit run on a component library costs a fraction, because each fix propagates.

In practice

A healthcare portal passed an automated scan with three minor contrast issues. Manual keyboard testing found the appointment-booking calendar unreachable without a mouse — the entire primary task. No scanner reports that, because the markup was technically valid.

Where teams get it wrong

  • Treating an automated scan as an audit. It covers roughly a third of the criteria.
  • Auditing at launch, when every finding is a structural change.
  • A findings list with no severity or ownership, which never becomes a plan.
  • Fixing pages instead of components, so the same issue returns on the next screen.
  • No retest after remediation, so nobody knows what was actually fixed.

( Learn more )

Related terms

All terms

Defined by Mara Bureau LLP. Last reviewed . Corrections: hello@mara.ink.

( You may ask )

Questions about Accessibility Audit

Didn’t find your answer?

Ask us directly — a designer replies within one business day.

Contact us
  • Automated scanning, manual keyboard testing, screen-reader testing, and a review against the relevant WCAG level — usually AA. The output is findings with severity, location and remediation guidance, not a pass/fail badge.

  • No. Automated testing catches roughly 30% — contrast, missing alt attributes, unlabelled fields. Focus order, meaningful alt text, state announcements and whether a flow can be completed by keyboard all require manual testing.

  • A full audit annually or before a major release, with automated checks in CI continuously and manual testing of new components as they ship. Auditing only before a procurement deadline guarantees expensive findings.

( Contact )

What problems are we solving?

At our core, we believe in delivering high-quality designs in days, not weeks.

What do you need?

( Contact )

What problems are we solving?

At our core, we believe in delivering high-quality designs in days, not weeks.

What do you need?